You supply
- The website or application and permission to review it.
- For planned code review, a selected GitHub repository and version.
- Only where agreed, permitted access for specific runtime or server checks.
TECHNICAL & SECURITY AUDIT
Review agreed parts of a website, application or codebase for technical and security concerns. Give developers the issue, where it was found and what to investigate or fix next.
Planned. GitHub code review and optional permitted server checks depend on the agreed scope and technical readiness.
THE JOB, IN PLAIN ENGLISH
AGREE WHAT WILL BE REVIEWED
A website, a repository and a running server offer different evidence. Agree the access and checks before work begins.
The website or application, the parts to review and permission to check them.
A developer issue list with affected pages, evidence and recommended follow-up.
A BRIEF A DEVELOPER CAN USE
Keep the relevant file, page or system reference with the finding. Explain what was observed and why it needs investigation.
A scoped review cannot certify that the whole system is secure. Unsupported checks and untested areas belong in the report.
BEFORE YOU START
No. A connection provides authorised access. The chosen version, supported checks and included files define the review, and untested areas must stay explicit.
The planned code review is read only. Repository writes, deployments and executing untrusted project code are not part of this marketing flow.
PHP versions, dependencies and related server checks are proposed scope. Any SSH or runtime access must be explicitly permitted and supported before it is used.
No. A scoped review cannot guarantee that a whole website, application or codebase is secure. Findings need qualified human review and follow-up.
Join the waitlist and tell us the work you need help with.
Compare all audits